[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476350986.2164.3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 02:29:46 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: linux.git: printk() problem
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 08:26 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 12-10-16 09:08:58, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 16:35 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 12-10-16 22:30:03, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that current linux.git generates hardly readable console output
> > > > due to KERN_CONT changes. Are you suggesting developers that output like
> > > > this be fixed?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Joe has already posted a patch
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c7df37c8665134654a17aaeb8b9f6ace1d6db58b.1476239034.git.joe@perches.com
> > >
> > > And in general I think that adding those KERN_CONT is a good thing to
> > > do.
> >
> >
> > As do I, but there are about a quarter _million_ uses of
> > printk/logging messages in the kernel tree with newlines.
> >
> > Maybe 100 or so of the existing messages lack terminating
> > newlines.
>
>
> I think they are not critical and can be fix once somebody notices.
As do I, but Linus objected to applying a patch when Colin Ian King
noticed one.
I think the 250,000 or so uses with newlines are enough of a
precedence to keep using newlines everywhere.
Now we'll have to have patches adding hundreds to thousands of the
missing KERN_CONTs for continuation lines that weren't previously a
problem in logging output but are now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists