[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161013112140.6f71fec7@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:21:40 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: arm_arch_timer: Don't assume clock
runs in suspend
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 11:12:09 -0700
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:
> The ARM ARM specifies that the system counter "must be implemented in an
> always-on power domain," and so we try to use the counter as a source of
> timekeeping across suspend/resume. Unfortunately, some SoCs (e.g.,
> Rockchip's RK3399) do not keep the counter ticking properly when
> switched from their high-power clock to the lower-power clock used in
> system suspend. Support this quirk by adding a new device tree property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists