lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:51:44 +0200 From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> To: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> Subject: Re: MPOL_BIND on memory only nodes On Thu 13-10-16 16:28:27, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 10/13/2016 03:37 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 13-10-16 15:24:54, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > [...] > >> Which makes the function look like this. Even with these changes, MPOL_BIND is > >> still going to pick up the local node's zonelist instead of the first node in > >> policy->v.nodes nodemask. It completely ignores policy->v.nodes which it should > >> not. > > > > Not really. I have tried to explain earlier. We do not ignore policy > > nodemask. This one comes from policy_nodemask. We start with the local > > node but fallback to some of the nodes from the nodemask defined by the > > policy. > > > > Yeah saw your response but did not get that exactly. We dont ignore > policy nodemask while memory allocation, correct. But my point was > we are ignoring policy nodemask while selecting zonelist which will > be used during page allocation. Though the zone contents of both the > zonelists are likely to be same, would not it be better to get the > zone list from the nodemask as well ? Why. Zonelist from the current node should contain all availanle zones and get_page_from_freelist then filters this zonelist accoring to mempolicy and nodemask > Or I am still missing something > here. The following change is what I am trying to propose. > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > index ad1c96a..f60ab80 100644 > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -1685,14 +1685,7 @@ static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy, > nd = policy->v.preferred_node; > break; > case MPOL_BIND: > - /* > - * Normally, MPOL_BIND allocations are node-local within the > - * allowed nodemask. However, if __GFP_THISNODE is set and the > - * current node isn't part of the mask, we use the zonelist for > - * the first node in the mask instead. > - */ > - if (unlikely(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE) && > - unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes))) > + if (unlikely(!node_isset(nd, policy->v.nodes))) > nd = first_node(policy->v.nodes); That shouldn't make much difference as per above. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists