[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161013032112.iy4hohrqplsajtye@thunk.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:21:13 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@...il.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, taesoo@...ech.edu,
changwoo@...ech.edu, sanidhya@...ech.edu, blee@...ech.edu,
csong84@...ech.edu, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Faccini, Bruno" <bruno.faccini@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] jbd2: fix incorrect unlock on j_list_lock
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 04:58:35PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:08 PM, Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below)
> >
> > J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ...
> >
> > 'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since
> > spin_lock() is called only in the 'if' and 'else-if' blocks but
> > not in the missing 'else' case, which results in a hang or an oops....
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@...il.com>
>
> We've hit this repeatedly on kernels with commit v3.14-rc2-30-g6e4862a
> "jbd2: minimize region locked by j_list_lock in journal_get_create_access"
> under heavy load and this patch has fixed the problem.
>
> It should also be considered for stable kernels after 3.14.
>
> [I've updated the above commit message slightly to give more details.]
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Thanks, applied.
Apologies, this got lost which is why I hadn't handled it earlier.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists