[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476364532-12634-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:15:32 +0300
From: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
<marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: acknowledge to NPS_IPI before handler
From: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
IPI_IRQ (also TIMER0_IRQ) should ack before the action->handler is called
in handle_percpu_devid_irq.
The IPI irq is edge sensitive and we might miss an IPI interrupt
if it was triggered during handling the interrupt itself.
Signed-off-by: Noam Camus <noamca@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c
index efbf0e4..ebc2b0b 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-eznps.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void nps400_irq_eoi_global(struct irq_data *irqd)
nps_ack_gic();
}
-static void nps400_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *irqd)
+static void nps400_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
{
unsigned int __maybe_unused irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct irq_chip nps400_irq_chip_percpu = {
.name = "NPS400 IC",
.irq_mask = nps400_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = nps400_irq_unmask,
- .irq_eoi = nps400_irq_eoi,
+ .irq_ack = nps400_irq_ack,
};
static int nps400_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists