[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFHUOYyv9jdY8Zrqq-=ZYx_rG7zpHEc4qrnXCb3xP6KwJPG07g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:21:18 -0700
From: Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Loc Ho <lho@....com>, Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Prakash, Prashanth
> <pprakash@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> On 10/13/2016 11:33 AM, Hoan Tran wrote:
>>> The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should
>>> be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC.
>>> The correct calculation is
>>> desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz
>>>
>>> And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly
>>> the same with the old perf.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>> Can you please pick this one for 4.9, as it is bug fix?
>
> Sure, I will queue it up.
>
Thanks, Rafael and Prashanth !
Hoan
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists