linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 4/4] mm, page_alloc: disallow migratetype fallback in fastpath

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:58:56 +0900
From:   Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] mm, page_alloc: disallow migratetype fallback in
 fastpath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:05:48PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The previous patch has adjusted async compaction so that it helps against
> longterm fragmentation when compacting for a non-MOVABLE high-order allocation.
> The goal of this patch is to force such allocations go through compaction
> once before being allowed to fallback to a pageblock of different migratetype
> (e.g. MOVABLE). In contexts where compaction is not allowed (and for order-0
> allocations), this delayed fallback possibility can still help by trying a
> different zone where fallback might not be needed and potentially waking up
> kswapd earlier.

Hmm... can we justify this compaction overhead in case of that there is
high order freepages in other migratetype pageblock? There is no guarantee
that longterm fragmentation happens and it affects the system
peformance.

And, it would easilly fail to compact in unmovable pageblock since
there would not be migratable pages if everything works as our
intended. So, I guess that checking it over and over doesn't help to
reduce fragmentation and just increase latency of allocation.

Thanks.