[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu896xme5sd5i8hs7tA=Xt=qQKCiAx7fQg1ZECn50NttbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:47:20 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
Subject: Re: [mac80211] BUG_ON with current -git (4.8.0-11417-g24532f7)
On 14 October 2016 at 09:42, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 09:41 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> > I assume the stack buffer itself is not the problem here, but aad,
>> > which is allocated on the stack one frame up.
>> > Do we really need to revert the whole patch to fix that?
>>
>> Ah never mind, this is about 'odata'. Apologies, should have read
>> first
>
> Right, odata also goes into an sg list and further on.
>
> I think we should wait for Herbert to chime in before we do any further
> work though, perhaps he has any better ideas.
>
Do you have a reference for the sg_set_buf() call on odata?
crypto/ccm.c does not seem to have it (afaict), and the same problem
does not exist in the accelerated arm64 implementation. In the mean
time, I will try and see if we can move aad[] off the stack in the WPA
code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists