| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <878ttrs22f.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:38:16 +0100
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
To: "Baicar\, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
robert.moore@...el.com, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
lv.zheng@...el.com, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
fu.wei@...aro.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, shijie.huang@....com, lenb@...nel.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com,
Dkvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devel@...ica.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/10] arm64: KVM: add guest SEA support
"Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org> writes:
> Hello Punit,
>
> On 10/13/2016 7:14 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> Hi Tyler,
>>
>> I know I've had my last comment already ;), but I thought I'd rather
>> raise the question than stay confused...
>>
>> Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Currently external aborts are unsupported by the guest abort
>>> handling. Add handling for SEAs so that the host kernel reports
>>> SEAs which occur in the guest kernel.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 1 +
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 5 +++++
>>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 1 +
>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 2 ++
>>> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> index e22089f..33a77509 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@
>>> #define FSC_FAULT (0x04)
>>> #define FSC_ACCESS (0x08)
>>> #define FSC_PERM (0x0c)
>>> +#define FSC_EXTABT (0x10)
>>> /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>>> #define HPFAR_MASK (~0xf)
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> index a3d61ad..86e1faa 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> @@ -24,4 +24,9 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
>>> #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
>>> +inline int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int
>>> esr)
>>> +{
>>> + return -1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> #endif /* __ASM_ARM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> index e9a5c0e..24cde84 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>>> #include <asm/kvm_asm.h>
>>> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>>> #include <asm/virt.h>
>>> +#include <asm/system_misc.h>
>>> #include "trace.h"
>>> @@ -1441,8 +1442,18 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu
>>> *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>> /* Check the stage-2 fault is trans. fault or write fault */
>>> fault_status = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault_type(vcpu);
>>> - if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
>>> - fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
>>> +
>>> + if (fault_status == FSC_EXTABT) {
>>> + if(handle_guest_sea((unsigned long)fault_ipa,
>>> + kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu))) {
>>> + kvm_err("Failed to handle guest SEA, FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
>>> + kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>>> + (unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
>>> + (unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>> + }
>>> + } else if (fault_status != FSC_FAULT && fault_status != FSC_PERM &&
>>> + fault_status != FSC_ACCESS) {
>>> kvm_err("Unsupported FSC: EC=%#x xFSC=%#lx ESR_EL2=%#lx\n",
>>> kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu),
>>> (unsigned long)kvm_vcpu_trap_get_fault(vcpu),
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> index 4b5c977..be0efb6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
>>> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@
>>> #define FSC_FAULT ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT
>>> #define FSC_ACCESS ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS
>>> #define FSC_PERM ESR_ELx_FSC_PERM
>>> +#define FSC_EXTABT ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT
>>> /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
>>> #define HPFAR_MASK (~UL(0xf))
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> index 90daf4a..8522fff 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>>> @@ -77,4 +77,6 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>> int sea_register_handler_chain(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>> void sea_unregister_handler_chain(struct notifier_block *nb);
>>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr);
>>> +
>>> #endif /* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> index 81cb7ad..d714432 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>>> @@ -597,6 +597,19 @@ static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr)
>>> }
>>> /*
>>> + * Handle Synchronous External Aborts that occur in a guest kernel.
>>> + */
>>> +int handle_guest_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr)
>>> +{
>>> + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>>> +
>>> + pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>>> + fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>> Don't we need to pass the abort to the guest?
> This requires some infrastructure to implement virtual "ACPI platform
> error interface" to expose the details of the abort to the guest. This
> patchset does not cover that and focuses on feature parity with other
> architectures that support APEI. There are discussions among Linaro
> partners about how this can be achieved in the long term, but that
> work is outside the scope of this patchset. This patch will ensure
> that if a guest encounters one of these errors then it will be
> reported before getting killed. Before this patch we would just get an
> unsupported FSC print out and then the guest would be killed.
OK.
I think we might be talking about different things though.
I am referring to the injection of the synchronous external abort into
the guest - similar to what's been done for prefetch abort in the
kvm_guest_handle_abort.
Maybe there is no benefit in passing the abort to the guest. In that
case, can you please add a comment where you handle external abort
(FSC_EXTABT) in kvm_guest_handle_abort.
>
> Thanks,
> Tyler
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Punit
>>
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> * Dispatch a data abort to the relevant handler.
>>> */
>>> asmlinkage void __exception do_mem_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists