linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] kprobes: unpoison stack in jprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161014130818.GA11804@leverpostej>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:08:26 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
        surovegin@...gle.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] kprobes: unpoison stack in jprobe_return() for KASAN

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:54:30PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> KASAN stack instrumentation poisons stack redzones on function entry
> and unpoisons them on function exit. If a function exits abnormally
> (e.g. with a longjmp like jprobe_return()), stack redzones are left
> poisoned. Later this leads to random KASAN false reports.
> 
> Unpoison stack redzones in the frames we are going to jump over
> before doing actual longjmp in jprobe_return().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

... judging by the kbuild test robot I spoke too soon, and should have
been more thorough. :/

> +/*
> + * Clear all poison for the region between the current SP and a provided
> + * watermark value, as is sometimes required prior to hand-crafted asm function
> + * returns in the middle of functions.
> + */
> +void kasan_unpoison_stack_above_sp_to(const void *watermark)
> +{
> +	const void *sp = (void *)current_stack_pointer();

Aargh; it seems current_stack_pointer() is only function-like on some
arches, and not on others (arm64 included). I should have known better;
sorry for the bad suggestion.

I'm not overjoyed about taking the address of a stack variable to
implement this ourselves. Can we use __builtin_frame_address(0) instead?
Or are there cases where that won't work on x86?

> +	size_t size = watermark - sp;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(sp > watermark))
> +		return;

... not a new problem, but we should also include <linux/bug.h> for
WARN_ON().

Thanks,
Mark.