[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1476450941.31114.45.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:15:41 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
"<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: aes_ccm: move struct aead_req off the stack
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 14:13 +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > But if we allocate things anyway, is it worth expending per-CPU
> > buffers on these?
>
> Ehmm, maybe not. I could spin a v2 that allocates a bigger buffer,
> and copies aad[] into it as well
Copies in/out, I guess. Also there's B_0/J_0 for CCM/GCM, and the
'zero' thing that GMAC has.
> That does not help the other algos though
What do you mean?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists