linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Device bindings documentation updated ACPI-enabled platforms not currently supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:20:45 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com, Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Device bindings documentation updated
 ACPI-enabled platforms not currently supported

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 06:30:15PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com wrote:
> > -		is_slave = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "isslave");
> 
> Which tree is this based on? I cant see the existing isslave property in
> mainline HEAD (commit 29fbff8698fc0ac1).

Same surprise here. Because I likely would have NAKed the binding.

Why is it needed? Doesn't the driver allow to be master/slave on the
same bus?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)