[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8199e1a-0bef-61ff-8cad-e1713c9f10a3@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 20:12:03 +0100
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <JGross@...e.com>
CC: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/8] xen/pvh: Bootstrap PVH guest
On 14/10/16 19:55, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 02:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> + jmp *%rax
>>> +
>>> +#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>>> +
>>> + call setup_pgtable_32
>>> +
>>> + mov $_pa(initial_page_table), %eax
>>> + movl %eax, %cr3
>>> +
>>> + movl %cr0, %eax
>>> + orl $(X86_CR0_PG | X86_CR0_PE), %eax
>>> + movl %eax, %cr0
>>> +
>>> + ljmp $__BOOT_CS,$1f
>>> +1:
>>> + call xen_prepare_pvh
>> Why does xen_prepare_pvh need paging? I can't spot anything which
>> should need it, and it feels conceptually wrong.
> xen_prepare_pvh() deals with virtual addresses. How can we run without paging?
Ah yes - with a high-half kernel, that way around doesn't work. Sorry
for the noise - I have been spending too long working with virtual
addresses down round 0, where that specifically can be solved by setting
%ds with a suitable non-zero base.
~Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists