[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161014063251.GA29252@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:32:51 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nadim Almas <nadim.902@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging:ks7010:eap_packet: fixed 80 character line
limit coding style issue
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:25:17AM +0530, Nadim Almas wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue
Why the indentation?
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadim Almas <nadim.902@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> -Comment is taken from below line.
Huh?
>
> drivers/staging/ks7010/eap_packet.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/eap_packet.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/eap_packet.h
> index df7f760..90432ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/eap_packet.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/eap_packet.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,13 @@ struct ieee802_1x_eapol_key {
> * encrypt the Key field; 64-bit NTP timestamp MAY be used here
> */
> unsigned char replay_counter[IEEE8021X_REPLAY_COUNTER_LEN];
> - unsigned char key_iv[IEEE8021X_KEY_IV_LEN]; /* cryptographically random number */
> + unsigned char key_iv[IEEE8021X_KEY_IV_LEN];
> + /* cryptographically random number */
Again, you put this below the line, which is not ok at all. Does this
seem to be the way you would normally read code?
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists