linux-kernel - Re: Kildall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <014eff3e-9f32-a015-5ce5-50891bdee2eb@purebeneficience.net>
Date:   Sat, 15 Oct 2016 14:31:29 +0200
From:   Ove Bjørn Karlsen <epost@...ebeneficience.net>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kildall

Den 10/6/2016 10:37, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
> Den 10/3/2016 17:10, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>> Den 10/3/2016 14:29, skrev Ove Bjørn Karlsen:
>>> I tried Linux in 2010, with the peak of the Ubuntu distribution, 
>>> Karmic Koala. And soon compiled my own kernel for it.  But little 
>>> recognition of my later low-jitter work it would seem. (That 
>>> actually removed all "disk read" stops, from high-performance 
>>> demanding games like Doom 3. Enabling a fluent 3x72 fps, since the 
>>> engine does 3 passes pr. frame.)
>>>
>>> And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like 
>>> Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was 
>>> some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the 
>>> room.
>>>
>>> In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall.
>>>
>>> Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been 
>>> the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer 
>>> OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and 
>>> copied as MS-DOS.
>>>
>>> When I analyse this, it seems american nationalism is at work. Gary 
>>> Kildall had parents of Norwegian and Swedish heritage. Yet few here 
>>> in Norway even seems to be aware of the "real" Bill Gates. While 
>>> many know the enthusiast computing environment have had their 
>>> brilliant people.
>>>
>>> When it comes to the discussion of "Microsoft Business Practises", 
>>> one should definately read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Kildall
>>>
>>> That is what it really ultimately is about. MS-DOS later even 
>>> admitted to have "CP/M source" in the sourcetree.
>>>
>>> Like I had to leave GNU support due to its obscurity, I have to 
>>> leave "MS" support for the same.
>>>
>>> Things Have To Be Done Right, and if anyone could do that, maybe 
>>> some new OS have a chance :)
>>>
>>> My view of a "good OS", is a high-level low-jitter optimized 
>>> innerloop construct, based on possily just-in-time interpretated 
>>> language, making most of the OS language one, and usable by newbies 
>>> and advanced, that might make assembly aswell. Where often used 
>>> library macros could ultimately be made in H/W and accelerated.
>>>
>>> If you are a brilliant programmer indeed, in the US, salute the 
>>> flag, and be american supergun... :|
>>>
>>> Or.. make a music video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odHUlDm6O-U
>>>
>>> Peaceful Saluations.
>>>
>> So to really say what I am thinking.. A Good OS Obeys Metaphysical Laws.
>>
>> Of Paradox Theos, or the culturally correct corresponding concept. 
>> (Probably not so much "god", but the original Gotan probably was 
>> that.) .                                  .
>>
>> Peaceful Salutations.
>>
> I also wrote this: 
> https://medium.com/@Stage_Mind/the-metaphysical-realities-of-a-good-low-jitter-operating-system-93e7b248e458#.gitf5ib10
>
>
Just to be a little bit crazy, if the remotest chance of anyone wanting 
me to work with this, and finance it, I would.

RightOS by Admirers Of Paradox Theos. Some of the most intelligen men in 
the world who respect the metaphysical might pull this off. And fix so 
many obscurities we find with the modern internet.

Peaceful Salutations.