linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161016161400.GA19899@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:14:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] external array access helpers

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 05:16:04PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The first two patches in the series fix the concrete bug (a boot crash
> when using gcc 7.0+) by defining new wrappers for arrays defined in
> linker scripts. These two patches should probably go into the kernel +
> stable as soon as people are happy with the new interface. Not sure who
> would pick this up, Greg maybe?

Ugh, that's messy, but nice fixup.  I can take these in my tree.  I'd
like to get others to review them first, but I can queue them up in a
week or so if there is no objections.

Is gcc 7.0 "stable" enough that people will start to be using it soon?

thanks,

greg k-h