[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161016203921.aq2iffthlowncisa@finsecur.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 22:39:21 +0200
From: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"wim@...ana.be" <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode
Hi Guenter,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:55:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline
> > > and therefore wasn't applied to stable branches.
> >
> > Possibly that happened because you did not copy the watchdog mailing list.
>
> ... and your other patches were not sent to the watchdog mailing list either,
> so you should not expect them to be picked up either.
>
> Seriously, how do you expect _any_ patch to be picked up if you neither copy
> the subsystem mailing list nor the subsystem maintainer ?
Whoops, thanks for the heads up, I wonder how I managed to mess up that
at that time, I usually take care of that. The other series need
respinning anyway so I can fix it for v2 (if any).
Cheers,
Sylvain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists