[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161017221037.1781185-2-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:10:14 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/28] block: rdb: false-postive gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized
When building with gcc-4.9 -Wmaybe-uninitialized, we get a bogus
warning in rbd_watch_cb, as the variable is not used at all
in the one case in which it is not initialized first:
drivers/block/rbd.c: In function ‘rbd_watch_cb’:
drivers/block/rbd.c:3690:5: error: ‘struct_v’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/block/rbd.c:3759:5: note: ‘struct_v’ was declared here
Later compiler versions fix this, but adding another initialization
here is harmless and lets us build cleanly with 4.9 as well.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index abb7162..4ab990b 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -3776,6 +3776,7 @@ static void rbd_watch_cb(void *arg, u64 notify_id, u64 cookie,
} else {
/* legacy notification for header updates */
notify_op = RBD_NOTIFY_OP_HEADER_UPDATE;
+ struct_v = 0;
len = 0;
}
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists