[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a298420136714ed7e91bf8f76bddbdabda35c1e3.1476690493.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:51:47 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 60/84] svc: Avoid garbage replies when pc_func() returns rpc_drop_reply
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit 0533b13072f4bf35738290d2cf9e299c7bc6c42a upstream.
If an RPC program does not set vs_dispatch and pc_func() returns
rpc_drop_reply, the server sends a reply anyway containing a single
word containing the value RPC_DROP_REPLY (in network byte-order, of
course). This is a nonsense RPC message.
Fixes: 9e701c610923 ("svcrpc: simpler request dropping")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Tested-by: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index b974571126fe..e7e552a07f6f 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -1182,7 +1182,8 @@ svc_process_common(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct kvec *argv, struct kvec *resv)
*statp = procp->pc_func(rqstp, rqstp->rq_argp, rqstp->rq_resp);
/* Encode reply */
- if (rqstp->rq_dropme) {
+ if (*statp == rpc_drop_reply ||
+ rqstp->rq_dropme) {
if (procp->pc_release)
procp->pc_release(rqstp, NULL, rqstp->rq_resp);
goto dropit;
--
2.10.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists