[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <79c7058361e80854e207be04bc880cf991a49ebf.1476690493.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:51:04 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 17/84] fix fault_in_multipages_...() on architectures with no-op access_ok()
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit e23d4159b109167126e5bcd7f3775c95de7fee47 upstream.
Switching iov_iter fault-in to multipages variants has exposed an old
bug in underlying fault_in_multipages_...(); they break if the range
passed to them wraps around. Normally access_ok() done by callers will
prevent such (and it's a guaranteed EFAULT - ERR_PTR() values fall into
such a range and they should not point to any valid objects).
However, on architectures where userland and kernel live in different
MMU contexts (e.g. s390) access_ok() is a no-op and on those a range
with a wraparound can reach fault_in_multipages_...().
Since any wraparound means EFAULT there, the fix is trivial - turn
those
while (uaddr <= end)
...
into
if (unlikely(uaddr > end))
return -EFAULT;
do
...
while (uaddr <= end);
Reported-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index bf944e86895b..db958a33caf1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -574,56 +574,56 @@ static inline int fault_in_pages_readable(const char __user *uaddr, int size)
*/
static inline int fault_in_multipages_writeable(char __user *uaddr, int size)
{
- int ret = 0;
char __user *end = uaddr + size - 1;
if (unlikely(size == 0))
- return ret;
+ return 0;
+ if (unlikely(uaddr > end))
+ return -EFAULT;
/*
* Writing zeroes into userspace here is OK, because we know that if
* the zero gets there, we'll be overwriting it.
*/
- while (uaddr <= end) {
- ret = __put_user(0, uaddr);
- if (ret != 0)
- return ret;
+ do {
+ if (unlikely(__put_user(0, uaddr) != 0))
+ return -EFAULT;
uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
- }
+ } while (uaddr <= end);
/* Check whether the range spilled into the next page. */
if (((unsigned long)uaddr & PAGE_MASK) ==
((unsigned long)end & PAGE_MASK))
- ret = __put_user(0, end);
+ return __put_user(0, end);
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static inline int fault_in_multipages_readable(const char __user *uaddr,
int size)
{
volatile char c;
- int ret = 0;
const char __user *end = uaddr + size - 1;
if (unlikely(size == 0))
- return ret;
+ return 0;
- while (uaddr <= end) {
- ret = __get_user(c, uaddr);
- if (ret != 0)
- return ret;
+ if (unlikely(uaddr > end))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ do {
+ if (unlikely(__get_user(c, uaddr) != 0))
+ return -EFAULT;
uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
- }
+ } while (uaddr <= end);
/* Check whether the range spilled into the next page. */
if (((unsigned long)uaddr & PAGE_MASK) ==
((unsigned long)end & PAGE_MASK)) {
- ret = __get_user(c, end);
- (void)c;
+ return __get_user(c, end);
}
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
int add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
--
2.10.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists