[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e102942f-597e-9149-6216-a0c23f07405b@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:17:15 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 06/35] media: ti-vpe: vpe: Do not perform job transaction
atomically
On 09/28/2016 11:20 PM, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> From: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...com>
>
> Current VPE driver does not start the job until all the buffers for
> a transaction are not queued. When running in multiple context, this might
I think this should be: s/not queued/queued/, right?
> increase the processing latency.
>
> Alternate solution would be to try to continue the same context as long as
> buffers for the transaction are ready; else switch the context. This may
> increase number of context switches but it reduces latency significantly.
>
> In this approach, the job_ready always succeeds as long as there are
> buffers on the CAPTURE and OUTPUT stream. Processing may start immediately
> as the first 2 iterations don't need extra source buffers. Shift all the
> source buffers after each iteration and remove the oldest buffer.
>
> Also, with this removes the constraint of pre buffering 3 buffers before
> call to STREAMON in case of de-interlacing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c
> index a0b29685fb69..9c38eff5df46 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/vpe.c
> @@ -898,15 +898,14 @@ static struct vpe_ctx *file2ctx(struct file *file)
> static int job_ready(void *priv)
> {
> struct vpe_ctx *ctx = priv;
> - int needed = ctx->bufs_per_job;
>
> - if (ctx->deinterlacing && ctx->src_vbs[2] == NULL)
> - needed += 2; /* need additional two most recent fields */
> -
> - if (v4l2_m2m_num_src_bufs_ready(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx) < needed)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (v4l2_m2m_num_dst_bufs_ready(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx) < needed)
> + /*
> + * This check is needed as this might be called directly from driver
> + * When called by m2m framework, this will always satisy, but when
typo: satisfy
> + * called from vpe_irq, this might fail. (src stream with zero buffers)
> + */
> + if (v4l2_m2m_num_src_bufs_ready(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx) <= 0 ||
> + v4l2_m2m_num_dst_bufs_ready(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx) <= 0)
> return 0;
>
> return 1;
> @@ -1116,19 +1115,20 @@ static void device_run(void *priv)
> struct sc_data *sc = ctx->dev->sc;
> struct vpe_q_data *d_q_data = &ctx->q_data[Q_DATA_DST];
>
> - if (ctx->deinterlacing && ctx->src_vbs[2] == NULL) {
> - ctx->src_vbs[2] = v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> - WARN_ON(ctx->src_vbs[2] == NULL);
> - ctx->src_vbs[1] = v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> - WARN_ON(ctx->src_vbs[1] == NULL);
> - }
> -
> ctx->src_vbs[0] = v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> WARN_ON(ctx->src_vbs[0] == NULL);
> ctx->dst_vb = v4l2_m2m_dst_buf_remove(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> WARN_ON(ctx->dst_vb == NULL);
>
> if (ctx->deinterlacing) {
> +
> + if (ctx->src_vbs[2] == NULL) {
> + ctx->src_vbs[2] = ctx->src_vbs[0];
> + WARN_ON(ctx->src_vbs[2] == NULL);
> + ctx->src_vbs[1] = ctx->src_vbs[0];
> + WARN_ON(ctx->src_vbs[1] == NULL);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * we have output the first 2 frames through line average, we
> * now switch to EDI de-interlacer
> @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ static irqreturn_t vpe_irq(int irq_vpe, void *data)
> }
>
> ctx->bufs_completed++;
> - if (ctx->bufs_completed < ctx->bufs_per_job) {
> + if (ctx->bufs_completed < ctx->bufs_per_job && job_ready(ctx)) {
> device_run(ctx);
> goto handled;
> }
>
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists