[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1476714428-11264-1-git-send-email-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 07:26:55 -0700
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cphealy@...il.com, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] Revamp Semtech SX150x driver
Hello,
I am working with a hardware design utilizing SX1506 GPIO expander
(actually it uses 1503, but they seem to be the same from SW's point
of view) and following are the pathches I had to make in order to be
able to succesfully use part's driver from upstream kernel.
I am pretty certain I did not do any of the DT bindings in a proper
way, so I am more than happy to change all of that, or, due to the
fact I don't use any of those bindings in my usecase, drop them
alltogether.
Thank you,
Andrey Smirnov
Andrey Smirnov (13):
gpio-sx150x: Remove 'gpio_base' from pdata
gpio-sx150x: Remove 'irq_summary' parameter
gpio-sx150x: Remove 'irq_base' parameter
gpio-sx150x: Replace 'io_polarity' with DT binding
bindings: gpio-sx150x: Document "semtech,io-polarity" binding
gpio-sx150x: Replace "io_pull*_ena" with DT bindings
bindings: gpio-sx150x: Document "semtech,io-pull*" bindings
gpio-sx150x: Replace 'reset_during_probe" with DT binding
bindings: gpio-sx150x: Document "semtech,reset-during-probe" bindings
gpio-sx150x: Replace 'oscio_is_gpio' with DT binding
bindings: gpio-sx150x: Document "semtech,oscio-is-gpo" binding
gpio-sx150x: Remove struct sx150x_platform_data
gpio-sx150x: Pass device type in DT match table
.../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-sx150x.txt | 29 ++++
drivers/gpio/gpio-sx150x.c | 184 +++++++++------------
2 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists