[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb9beadc-3ea2-c09c-f621-a54cd73e3647@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:30:43 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Joe Perches <coupons@...ches.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, kbuild-all@...org,
ltp@...ts.linux.it
Subject: Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?
>> Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider
>> implementation details from three status functions?
>>
> No.
Thanks for this kind of promising feedback.
> But we're waiting for you showing is that it is an improvement.
Can this aspect also be clarified to some degree from a logical point of view?
* Would you really like to know under which circumstances data processing
will be faster for a single character instead of using a string pointer
and corresponding two characters?
* Do you care for a changed memory allocation characteristic?
* Will it occasionally be useful to avoid the storage for another string literal?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists