[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5804E4FC.3000005@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:19:32 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, hekuang@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
eranian@...gle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, chris.ryder@....com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: Cleanup arch specific stuff
On Monday 17 October 2016 08:15 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:13:38PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>
>> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:19:28PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>>> On Monday 10 October 2016 10:09 PM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>>>>> On 2016/10/10 01:24PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>>>> Em Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:29:02PM +0530, Ravi Bangoria escreveu:
>>>>>>> Move arch specific stuff from util/annotate.c to their respective
>>>>>>> files in util/annotate directory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No functionality changes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 259 +++----------------------------------
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 23 ++++
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/Build | 3 +
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/arm.c | 50 +++++++
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/powerpc.c | 63 +++++++++
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/annotate/x86.c | 107 +++++++++++++++
>>>>>> We already have a per arch area: tools/perf/arch/
>>>>> I think this was done to support cross-arch annotate similar to the
>>>>> remote unwind support with util/libunwind/
>>>> Yes, because tools/perf/arch/ will only include host arch code.
>>> Ok, thanks for clarifying.
>> Hi Arnaldo,
>>
>> Are you ok with this patchset. Please let me know if you want to respin it.
> We're in the merge window, and I'm having to deal with other patches
> requiring more work than I was expecting to invest on them, so no time
> to revisit this, sorry, but I have not forgot about it, will get back to
> it as time permits,
Sure, no issues. :)
-Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists