linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: audio: Rename cport with intf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161017153125.GD23255@localhost>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:31:25 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.bharadiya@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, vaibhav.sr@...il.com,
        mgreer@...malcreek.com, johan@...nel.org, elder@...nel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: audio: Rename cport with intf_id

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 03:29:14PM +0530, Pankaj Bharadiya wrote:
> gb_audio_manager_module_descriptor's cport field is actually used to
> manage and pass interface id to user space.
> 
> Thus rename gb_audio_manager_module_descriptor's 'cport' field and
> few other things to avoid confusion.

Please be more specific about what these other things are; in this case
sysfs attributes, uevent vars, and an odd-looking sysfs-string
interface (more?).

Wouldn't this change break any current user-space implementation?

Also why aren't any of these attributes documented as they should be?

Thanks,
Johan