linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/37] 4.8.2-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7hfunvc4dw.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:43:55 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/37] 4.8.2-stable review

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:07:12PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc boot: 8 boots: 0 failed, 4 passed with 4 offline (v4.8.1-38-g9ccca26a1585)
>
> That's not many boots, what went wrong here?  What happened to the 100+
> that 4.7 was getting?

Hmm, looks like there were no ARM builds, which is what most of the boot
platforms are.  Not sure yet what went wrong there.

But v4.8.2 itself is looking fine, with three known failures that are
under investigation:

   https://kernelci.org/job/stable-rc/branch/local:linux-4.8.y/
   
Kevin