[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXGRf3z8gGw6fjeMCzb=X_OF6y0Rbhh-wAGjUVad8eaMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 14:03:17 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Matt Mullins <mmullins@...x.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 4.9] hw_random: Don't use a stack buffer in add_early_randomness()
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 10:30:13 CEST schrieb Andy Lutomirski:
>
> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Sure, but shouldn't that be a separate patch covering the whole hw_crypto
>> core?
>
> I think that you are right -- there are many more cases where a memset(0) is
> warranted.
>
> Do you want to make this change or should I send a patch?
Can you do it? I have my work cut out for me making sure that all the
known regressions get stomped quickly...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists