[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58053FE5.3020208@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:17:25 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Agustin Vega-Frias <agustinv@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
marc.zyngier@....com
Cc: cov@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org, harba@...eaurora.org,
jcm@...hat.com, msalter@...hat.com, mlangsdo@...hat.com,
ahs3@...hat.com, astone@...hat.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, charles.garcia-tobin@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] ACPI: Add support for ResourceSource/IRQ domain
mapping
Just a few nits:
Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> +int acpi_irq_domain_register_irq(struct acpi_resource_source *source, u32 hwirq,
> + int trigger, int polarity)
> +{
> + struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
> + struct acpi_device *device;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> + acpi_status status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (source->string_length == 0)
Would (!source->string_length) be more meaningful?
> + return acpi_register_gsi(NULL, hwirq, trigger, polarity);
> +
> + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle);
> + if (!device)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + if (acpi_irq_domain_ensure_probed(device))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + fwspec.fwnode = &device->fwnode;
> + fwspec.param[0] = hwirq;
> + fwspec.param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(trigger, polarity);
> + fwspec.param_count = 2;
> +
> + ret = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec);
> + acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(device);
> + return ret;
Blank line before 'return'.
> -static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
> +static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 hwirq,
> + struct acpi_resource_source *source,
This should probably be a 'const', because ...
> @@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
> {
> struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
> struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq;
> + struct acpi_resource_source dummy = { 0, 0, NULL };
... then you can make this a static const, which will reduce code size
and improve performance.
> @@ -1024,6 +1030,43 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry {
> (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \
> &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \
> })
> +
> +#define ACPI_HID_LEN 9
Please add a comment for this.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists