[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8edb1a0aaa886ffc80564117a020f490@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 17:13:56 -0700
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: vinholikatti@...il.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] scsi: ufs: fix race between clock gating and
devfreq scaling work
On 2016-10-14 13:47, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Subhash" == Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org> writes:
>
> Subhash> UFS devfreq clock scaling work may require clocks to be ON if
> Subhash> it need to execute some UFS commands hence it may request for
> Subhash> clock hold before issuing the command. But if UFS clock gating
> Subhash> work is already running in parallel, ungate work would end up
> Subhash> waiting for the clock gating work to finish and as clock
> gating
> Subhash> work would also wait for the clock scaling work to finish, we
> Subhash> would enter in deadlock state. Here is the call trace during
> Subhash> this deadlock state:
>
> Somebody from the UFS camp, please review!
As there was no review so far, i have moved this patch as first patch in
the new UFS bug fixes patch series ([PATCH v1 00/11] scsi: ufs: bug
fixes patch series #1) sent by me today.
Thanks,
Subhash
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists