linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Vendor events file/dir names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161018075901.GB21544@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:59:01 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Vendor events file/dir names


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 	Ingo pointed out to me that in the kernel sources we do not use
> file/dir names with uppercase chars (look, for instance, at arch/), so I
> mostly scripted a conversion to lowercase and what I got is at:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/vendor_events
>    
>    https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=perf/vendor_events
> 
> 	I did test it on my Lenovo t450s (Broadwell) and got the same
> results as before, and the changed file and directory names don't get
> presented to the user AFAIK, so its just a matter of consistency with
> the existing practices in the kernel sources, no visible difference to
> users.
> 
> 	Please let me know if you have any technical argument against
> this move,

Looks good to me!

Thanks,

	Ingo