[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <022d01d22922$dad86f90$90894eb0$@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:34:41 +0800
From: "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
To: <zhouxianrong@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <mhocko@...e.com>,
<vdavydov.dev@...il.com>, <minchan@...nel.org>, <riel@...hat.com>,
<zhouxiyu@...wei.com>, <zhangshiming5@...wei.com>,
<won.ho.park@...wei.com>, <tuxiaobing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bdi flusher should not be throttled here when it fall into buddy slow path
> @@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> long pages_written;
>
> set_worker_desc("flush-%s", dev_name(wb->bdi->dev));
> - current->flags |= PF_SWAPWRITE;
If flags carries PF_LESS_THROTTLE before modified, then you
have to restore it.
> + current->flags |= (PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_BDI_FLUSHER | PF_LESS_THROTTLE);
>
> if (likely(!current_is_workqueue_rescuer() ||
> !test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))) {
> @@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ void wb_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> else if (wb_has_dirty_io(wb) && dirty_writeback_interval)
> wb_wakeup_delayed(wb);
>
> - current->flags &= ~PF_SWAPWRITE;
> + current->flags &= ~(PF_SWAPWRITE | PF_BDI_FLUSHER | PF_LESS_THROTTLE);
> }
>
thanks
Hillf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists