[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161018112548.GA11471@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:55:48 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: uniphier: add CPU clock and OPP table
for LD11 SoC
On 16-10-16, 23:59, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> + cluster0_opp: opp_table {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> + opp-shared;
> +
> + opp@...000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <245000000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <250000000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <490000000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...333333 {
Why isn't ^^ matching with below values ? Same in next patch as well.
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <653334000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...666666 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <666667000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + opp@...000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <980000000>;
> + clock-latency-ns = <300>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> clocks {
> refclk: ref {
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> --
> 1.9.1
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists