lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:15:57 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
        Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Do not decay new task load on first enqueue

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct, at 01:10:17PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > I'm entirely lost as to which patch we're talking about by now ;-)
> 
> Heh, this one from Vincent,
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161010173440.GA28945@linaro.org

Ah, right.

Seems like a sensible thing to do, and I suppose I should go finish my
(and yours) update_rq_clock() patches that supersede the patch referred
to in that thing and is depended upon.


It might make sense to have helper functions to evaluate those
conditions, because currently there's two instances of each, once in the
branch selection and then again (but inverted, we miss the == case fwiw)
in the return NULL case.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ