[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161018125731.GB29358@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:57:31 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 1/8] locking/drm: Kill mutex trickery
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 02:48:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 04:52:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Poking at lock internals is not cool. Since I'm going to change the
> > implementation this will break, take it out.
> >
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 26 +++-----------------------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 23 +++--------------------
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> OK, so it appears that i915 changed their locking around and got rid of
> this thing entirely. Much appreciated Chris!!
It's not dead yet! Sorry.
It's close though, in the next cycle we may be at a point where we don't
rely on recursion locking in the shrinker.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists