[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161018155757.GA24274@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:57:57 +0100
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieran@...uared.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scripts/gdb: fixup some pep8 errors in proc.py
Hi Kieran,
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Pete,
>
> On 18/10/16 16:07, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > proc.py:22:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
> > proc.py:200:1: E302 expected 2 blank lines, found 1
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > scripts/gdb/linux/proc.py | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/proc.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/proc.py
> > index f20fcfa..2d6f74e 100644
> > --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/proc.py
> > +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/proc.py
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ from linux import tasks
> > from linux import lists
> > from struct import *
> >
> > +
>
> This was added by patch 1, and can be squashed there.
Doh, I had deliberately done it as a separate commit, as I thought it was
a pre-existing pep8 error.
Will squash in v2.
regards,
Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists