[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1610181909540.2950@hadrien>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:10:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
cc: mmarek@...e.com, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, Gilles.Muller@...6.fr,
nicolas.palix@...g.fr, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lars@...afoo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Coccinelle: misc: Add support for devm variant
in all modes
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday 16 October 2016 10:37 PM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> > Add missing support for the devm_request_threaded_irq in
> > the rules of context, report and org modes.
> >
> > Misc:
> > ----
> > To be consistent with other scripts, change confidence level
> > of the script to 'Moderate'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci | 10 +++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
> > index 03b748d..f6c93fd 100644
> > --- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
> > +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> > /// So pass the IRQF_ONESHOT flag in this case.
> > ///
> > //
> > -// Confidence: Good
> > +// Confidence: Moderate
> > // Comments:
> > // Options: --no-includes
> >
> > @@ -89,13 +89,21 @@ devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, thread_fn,
> > @depends on context@
> > position p != {r1.p,r2.p};
> > @@
> > +(
> > *request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, ...)
> > +|
> > +*devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, ...)
> > +)
> >
> > @match depends on report || org@
> > expression irq;
> > position p != {r1.p,r2.p};
> > @@
> > +(
> > request_threaded_irq@p(irq, NULL, ...)
> > +|
> > +devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, ...)
> > +)
>
> Oh, my bad here. :(
>
> Forgot the initialization of meta variables for the
> arguments.
>
> But I am wondering why coccicheck didn't fail here.
> Isn't it suppose to give parsing errors? Or it doesn't
> do that?
It just give a warning, which I guess make coccicheck hides. It is
allowed to require an argument to be named dev, although it is nicer if
one declares it with symbol in that case.
julia
>
> In any case, I am sorry for this. I'll send the revised
> version of the patches.
>
> > @script:python depends on org@
> > p << match.p;
> >
>
> --
> Vaishali
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists