lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1476881123-10159-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:45:23 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        joseph.salisbury@...onical.com
Cc:     joonwoop@...eaurora.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix wrong task group's load_avg

A regression has been reported with:
commit 3d30544f0212 ("sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes)
when several level of task groups are involved
and cpu_possible_mask != cpu_present_mask.

The root cause is that group entity's load (tg_child->se[i]->avg.load_avg)
is initialized to scale_load_down(se->load.weight). During the creation of
a child task group, its group entities on possible CPUs are attached to
parent's cfs_rq (tg_parent) and their loads are added in parent's load
(tg_parent->load_avg) with update_tg_load_avg.

But only the load on online CPUs will be then updated to reflect real load
whereas load on other CPUs will stay to the initial value. The result is
a tg_parent->load_avg that is higher than the real load, the weight
of group entities (tg_parent->se[i]->load.weight) on online CPUs is smaller
than it should be, and the task group gets a less running time than what
it could expect.

This situation can be detected with /proc/sched_debug. The ".tg_load_avg"
of the task group will be much higher than sum of ".tg_load_avg_contrib"
of online cfs_rqs of the task group.

The load of group entities don't have to be intialized to something else
than 0 because their load will increase when entity will be attached.

Fixes: 3d30544f0212 ("sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes)
Reported-by: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.8.x
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8b03fb5..89776ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -690,7 +690,14 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
 	 * will definitely be update (after enqueue).
 	 */
 	sa->period_contrib = 1023;
-	sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
+	/*
+	 * Tasks are intialized with full load to be seen as heavy task until
+	 * they get a chance to stabilize to their real load level.
+	 * group entity are intialized with null load to reflect the fact that
+	 * nothing has been attached yet to the task group.
+	 */
+	if (entity_is_task(se))
+		sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
 	sa->load_sum = sa->load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
 	/*
 	 * At this point, util_avg won't be used in select_task_rq_fair anyway
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ