linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] rtc-cmos: Reject unsupported alarm values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:41:18 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Cc:     a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rtc-cmos: Reject unsupported alarm values

Hi,

On 04/10/2016 at 00:50:28 +0200, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote :
> Some platforms allows to specify the month and day of the month in
> which an alarm should go off, some others the day of the month and
> some others just the time.
> 
> Currently any given value is accepted by the driver and only the
> supported fields are used to program the hardware. As consequence,
> alarms are potentially programmed to go off in the wrong moment.
> 
> Fix this by rejecting any unsupported value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com