[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP06WZx3A0VrOPKh+jPF9UbfcgsXpnyJn85R7Y1rpPm7zqJL4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:51:57 +0800
From: Leon Yu <chianglungyu@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Janis Danisevskis <jdanis@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: fix NULL dereference when reading /proc/<pid>/auxv
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:59:40PM +0800, Leon Yu wrote:
> > Reading auxv of any kernel thread results in NULL pointer dereferencing in
> > auxv_read() where mm can be NULL or even error code. Fix that by testing mm
> > with IS_ERR_OR_NULL() helper. This is also the original behavior changed by
> > recent commit c5317167854e ("proc: switch auxv to use of __mem_open()").
>
> What the... How can it be ERR_PTR(...) after it has passed __mem_open()?
Doh.. didn't realize that IS_ERR() case can't happen.
> I agree that we ought to check for NULL mm (the only question is whether it's
> best done by failing open() or by treating the file as empty), but this
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is pure cargo-cult, AFAICS.
Treating the file in question as empty might be a better choice, just in case
something depends on old behavior.
-Leon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists