[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r37c4mhn.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:16:52 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kernel-team@...com,
"linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Oops on Power8 (was Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] workqueue: make workqueue available early during boot)
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
> Hello, Michael.
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 03:37:42PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> That doesn't compile, wq doesn't exist.
>>
>> I guessed that you meant:
>>
>> + wq_numa_init();
>> + list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
>> + wq_update_unbound_numa(wq, smp_processor_id(), true);
>
> Yeap, sorry about that.
No worries.
>> And that does boot.
>>
>> The sysrq-t output is below, it's rather large.
>
> Didn't expect that many cpus but it looks good.
I have another system here with twice as many CPUs if that would help ;)
> I'll post proper patches soon.
Thanks. Can you pull the current series out of linux-next for now until
you merge the new series?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists