[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161019015452.GE513@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:54:52 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv3 1/6] printk: use vprintk_func in vprintk()
On (10/18/16 12:49), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:40:40 +0900
> Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > vprintk(), just like printk(), better be using per-cpu printk_func
> > instead of direct vprintk_emit() call. Just in case if vprintk()
> > will ever be called from NMI, or from any other context that can
> > deadlock in printk().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Thanks.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists