linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable EEPROM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5740014.mZjAIri61F@wuerfel>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:04:15 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable EEPROM_AT25 config option

On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:23:26 PM CEST Scott Branden wrote:
> I have be.config and le.config that allow you to switch the defconfig
> between big and little endian.  Does this make sense to upstream to
> arm/configs if you have accepted dram_0x00000000.config?

Yes, they clearly fall into the same category, let's merge those as well.
 
> Would you also accept this to arm64/configs?  We actually use
> big and little endian on the same SoC more on arm64 platforms.  But, in
> order to boot big endian we need to maintain this outside the kernel
> right now.

I'm in favor of that, but let's see what the arm64 maintainers think.

	Arnd