linux-kernel - Re: [v4.8-rc1 Regression] sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <550def7c-a0e6-b2ae-7bef-aeec6f068cfb@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:46:14 +0100
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, omer.akram@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [v4.8-rc1 Regression] sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes

On 18/10/16 12:56, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Le Tuesday 18 Oct 2016 à 12:34:12 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> On 18 October 2016 at 11:07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

[...]

> 
> The patch below fixes the issue on my platform: 
> 
> Dietmar, Omer can you confirm that this fix the problem of your platform too ?

It fixes this broken BIOS issue on my T430 ( cpu_possible_mask >
cpu_online_mask). I ran the original test with the cpu hogs (stress -c
4). Launch time of applications becomes normal again.

Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>

But this test only makes sure that we don't see any ghost contribution
(from non-existing cpus) any more.

We should study the tg->se[i]->avg.load_avg for the hierarchy of tg's
(with the highest tg having a task enqueued) a little bit more, with and
without your v5 'sched: reflect sched_entity move into task_group's load'.

> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 8b03fb5..89776ac 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,14 @@ void init_entity_runnable_average(struct sched_entity *se)
>  	 * will definitely be update (after enqueue).
>  	 */
>  	sa->period_contrib = 1023;
> -	sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
> +	/*
> +	 * Tasks are intialized with full load to be seen as heavy task until
> +	 * they get a chance to stabilize to their real load level.
> +	 * group entity are intialized with null load to reflect the fact that
> +	 * nothing has been attached yet to the task group.
> +	 */
> +	if (entity_is_task(se))
> +		sa->load_avg = scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
>  	sa->load_sum = sa->load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>  	/*
>  	 * At this point, util_avg won't be used in select_task_rq_fair anyway