[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161019183218.GU26852@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 11:32:18 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, tools, list: Support matching by topic
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
> > index 1095a6dada66..c00b0eb343c0 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-list.c
> > @@ -67,9 +67,11 @@ int cmd_list(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
> > print_symbol_events(NULL, PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> > event_symbols_sw, PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX, raw_dump);
> > else if (strcmp(argv[i], "cache") == 0 ||
> > - strcmp(argv[i], "hwcache") == 0)
> > + strcmp(argv[i], "hwcache") == 0) {
>
> This is changing existing behaviour, please remove it. A separate patch
> could either make it show both hwcache events and vendor cache events,
That's what the patch does: "show both hwcache and vendor cache events"
which is a reasonable default.
I can split it into a separate patch if makes you feel better.
>
> > print_hwcache_events(NULL, raw_dump);
> > - else if (strcmp(argv[i], "pmu") == 0)
> > + print_pmu_events(argv[i], raw_dump, !desc_flag,
> > + long_desc_flag, true);
> > + } else if (strcmp(argv[i], "pmu") == 0)
> > print_pmu_events(NULL, raw_dump, !desc_flag,
> > long_desc_flag, false);
>
> What is this here?
Only adding a } but diff displays it in a weird way.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists