[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4c7c1c9-4b6c-8d25-52fe-9884bf4f3444@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:49:40 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] perf_event_open.2: PERF_RECORD_SWITCH support
On 10/19/2016 05:14 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/man2/perf_event_open.2 b/man2/perf_event_open.2
>>> index 68b99bb..04a0cf5 100644
>>> +.B PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE
>>> +records when sampling in cpu-wide mode.
>>> +This functionality is in addition to existing tracepoint and
>>> +software events for measuring context switches.
>>> +The advantage of this method is that it will give full
>>
>> s/give full/give a full/
>>
>> ok?
>>
>>> +information event with strict
>>> +.I perf_event_paranoid
>>> +settings.
>
> What I meant to say was
>
> "it will give full information *even* with strict perf_event_paranoid
> settings"
>
> Maybe saying something like "despite strict settings" would be better
> wording.
>
> not sure how I missed that typo, apparently my fingers are used to typing
> "event" too much.
Thanks, Vince. Fixed now.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists