[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020062400.GA28411@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:24:00 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result
* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently unable to boot a Yoga 900 with latest mainline, but 4.8 boots.
>
> The symptom is a reboot before the video console is available.
>
> I bisected to commit 816e76129ed5 "efi: Allow drivers to reserve boot
> services forever". However, that commit is known to be broken. The
> proposed fix, commit 92dc33501bfb "x86/efi: Round EFI memmap
> reservations to EFI_PAGE_SIZE", also exhibits the reboot problem.
>
> During the bisect some of the stopping points landed on commits that
> caused the boot process to hang rather than cause a reboot. The
> commits that resulted in a hang are marked "git bisect skip" in this
> log: https://gist.github.com/djbw/1b501daa98192a42ae848f03bb59c30e
>
> I'll try treating those hangs as bad bisect results and re-run the
> full bisect tomorrow. In the meantime I wonder if the bisect log
> implicates a better regression candidate?
You could also try reverts of the suspicious commits, and then, if the reverted
kernel works fine, create a more linear history by cherry-picking them in the
right order - and then be able to pinpoint the bad commit with a higher
confidence.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists