linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161020063735.GA16644@splinter>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:37:35 +0300
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:01:42AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   include/linux/netdevice.h
>   net/core/dev.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   e4961b076885 ("net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   1a3f060c1a47 ("net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices")
>   f1170fd462c6 ("net: Remove all_adj_list and its references")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just used the net-next tree version) and can carry the
> fix as necessary.

Yes, net-next is correct. Thanks Stephen!