[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161020103707.GB3175@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:37:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Cavium ThunderX uncore PMU support
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:30:36AM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Note:
> I'm using perf_sw_context in difference to perf_invalid_context
> (see WARN_ON in perf_pmu_register). Reason is that with perf_invalid_context
> add() is never called and the counter results are shown as "unsupported" by
> perf. With perf_sw_context everything works as expected.
What?! All the uncore PMUs use perf_invalid_context. What doesn't work
for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists