[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06ba6563-2792-cb08-694e-4582618ae7fb@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:41:57 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] ASoC: samsung: Print a one-time
message if the snow driver's probe defers
Hello Sylwester,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 10/20/2016 06:12 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 10/19/2016 07:21 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> If the snd_soc_register_card() fails due a missing resource and the probe
>> has to be deferred, the driver prints an error message.
>>
>> But since many probe retries can happen before a resource is available,
>> the printed messages can spam the kernel log buffer and slow the boot.
>
> Do you know why CPU DAI is not registered by the time snow machine
> driver gets probed? Did you try to debug the I2S driver? Does perhaps
> deferring happen due to some I2S clocks missing? DMA seems to be
> already initialized.
> The deferral loop looks suspicious, do you perhaps know what commits
It's suspicious indeed and I've been trying to figure out what changed
the behavior in v4.8 but I haven't found it yet.
> in v4.8 cause such changes in probing order? Did you start to use
I did a git bisect to find the first v4.8 commit that caused this but
finished in a merge commit c9b95e5961c0 ("Merge tag 'sound-4.8-rc1' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound").
That branch alone works the same than v4.7 so it seems that is not a
single commit but a combination from different branches that caused
this on integration.
> some drivers as loadable module?
>
I see no relevant changes in exynos_defconfig between v4.7..v4.8 and
also no changes in drivers/Makefile that could cause things to be
initialized on a different order.
But I thought the patches had merits on its own since probe deferral
can make a driver probe many times and the error logs were noisy. I
wasn't sure though and that's why are marked as RFC.
> As far as the error log is concerned, I would just not print anything
> in snow_probe() when register_card() returns EPROBE_DEFER.
>
I believe it may be useful to know that a driver's probe is deferring due
a missing dependency but have no strong opinion and can remove the message.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists