linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / gpio: Updates to properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161020123510.GH24289@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:35:10 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI / gpio: Updates to properties

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Mika Westerberg
> 
> >> Any comments on the GPIO patches in this series?
> >>
> >> At least the last one does not add any new bindings so it should be fine
> >> to apply.
> >
> > I have no comments, but I'd suggest resending them as a new series on
> > top of 4.9-rc1 (which includes the generic patches from this series).
> >
> > You can add my ACK to them if that helps.
> 
> OK I had some comments so please adress these but resend on top
> of v4.9-rc1 indeed. If they are already higher up in my mailbox then
> look into my comments and post again, hehe.

I will, thanks!